The MOST significant problem with the dentist's approach is:
Ethics and professionalism questions in the ADC written exam test your understanding of the Dental Board of Australia Code of Conduct — professional boundaries, mandatory reporting, delegation, and cultural safety. This exam-level vignette tests your ability to apply the Code to clinical scenarios.
A dentist's mother presents with a painful swollen face consistent with a dental abscess. The dentist examines her, prescribes antibiotics, and schedules an extraction for the following day. During the extraction planning, the dentist notices a suspicious radiolucency on the radiograph that could indicate a more serious pathology but decides not to mention it to avoid alarming her. The MOST significant problem with the dentist's approach is:
- A. The dentist should not have treated a family member at all — the Code prohibits providing clinical care to close family members under any circumstances
- B. The dentist's clinical judgement has been impaired by the personal relationship, leading to a failure to communicate findings that would have been disclosed to any other patient
- C. The dentist should have charged the standard consultation fee rather than treating the mother for free, as fee waivers for family members constitute a financial conflict of interest
- D. The dentist should have obtained formal written consent from the mother specifically acknowledging the risks of being treated by a family member
The only ADC prep platform where every answer is traced to the guideline source.
No invented explanations. No guesswork content. Every question mapped to Therapeutic Guidelines, Odell's, IADT, and more — so you study what the exam actually tests.
Score high, pay less.
Think you already know your stuff? 15 questions. One attempt. Your score sets your discount — up to 50% off any plan, locked for 72 hours.
Try Reviz on WhatsApp.
A cited question every morning — free until the day you sit. No app, no card, no signup. Just open WhatsApp.
Show the answer and cited explanation
Section 3.14 recognises the risks of treating close relationships, specifically warning about 'lack of objectivity' as a core concern. The dentist's decision to withhold a concerning radiographic finding to 'avoid alarming' the patient is the exact impairment of clinical judgement the Code warns about — they would not withhold this from any other patient. Option A overstates the prohibition — the Code says treating close relationships 'can be inappropriate,' not that it is prohibited. It permits it with safeguards. Option C misidentifies the issue — the Code's concern with treating close relationships is objectivity and care quality, not fee arrangements. Option D fabricates a written consent requirement for treating family that does not exist in the Code.
Exam preparation FAQ
Every answer, traced to the source.
Remy — the AI tutor inside Reviz — drills you on 7,000+ ADC-style cited questions with spaced repetition, on WhatsApp and the web.
Take the Remy Challenge