Why is ignoring a sharps injury unacceptable for a dental professional?
Infection control in the ADC exam tests decision-making around exposure incidents, instrument classification, and decontamination protocols. This exam-level vignette tests your ability to work through clinical details and arrive at the correct management.
A colleague suggests that sharps injuries are so common it is easier to just wash the wound and forget about it. Why is ignoring a sharps injury unacceptable for a dental professional?
- A. Only injuries from known HIV-positive patients matter
- B. It is acceptable to ignore minor injuries
- C. PEP can reduce HIV transmission risk by over 80%
- D. The risk is too small to worry about
The only ADC prep platform where every answer is traced to the guideline source.
No invented explanations. No guesswork content. Every question mapped to Therapeutic Guidelines, Odell's, IADT, and more — so you study what the exam actually tests.
Score high, pay less.
Think you already know your stuff? 15 questions. One attempt. Your score sets your discount — up to 50% off any plan, locked for 72 hours.
Try Reviz on WhatsApp.
A cited question every morning — free until the day you sit. No app, no card, no signup. Just open WhatsApp.
Show the answer and cited explanation
Ignoring a sharps injury is both clinically reckless and professionally unacceptable. The practical reason is that PEP's 81% risk reduction requires timely action. The ethical reason is that an infected dentist could unknowingly transmit BBVs to patients and partners — this constitutes a serious breach of duty of care. The legal reason is that undocumented injuries cannot support compensation claims. The professional reason is that regulatory bodies expect healthcare workers to follow national guidelines and protect patients.
Exam preparation FAQ
Every answer, traced to the source.
Remy — the AI tutor inside Reviz — drills you on 7,000+ ADC-style cited questions with spaced repetition, on WhatsApp and the web.
Take the Remy Challenge